Luke 19:47-20:26

Dear RTB’ers,

The Lord is risen! He is risen, indeed! Hallelujah!!

The chief priests and the scribes and the principal men of the people were seeking to destroy Him, but they did not find anything they could do, for all the people were hanging on His words.

Luke 19:47b-48

The scribes and the chief priests sought to lay hands on Him at that very hour, … but they feared the people.

Luke 20:19

And they were not able in the presence of the people to catch Him in what He said, but marveling at His answer they became silent.

Luke 20:26

The chief priests and the scribes have one goal during that eventful Holy Week, to destroy Jesus. They ask Him questions, intentionally designed to make Him fail. But He outwits them each time. And even though they are marveling at His answer, they cannot bring themselves to acknowledge Him for who He is. Nearly a century ago another skeptic got fed up with all the Jesus nonsense that he was hearing and set out to disprove the Resurrection. As I recall, he used only “internal texts” (no outside sources) from that first Holy Week, essentially letting the gospels speak for themselves. In the end that skeptic, who wrote under the name of Frank Morison, not only could not disprove the Resurrection, but ended up embracing Jesus and His truth and came to be a believer himself. His search became a widely popular book, Who Moved the Stone?, originally published in 1930. This Easter morning I would encourage you to order that book or maybe check it out from the library, because without the Resurrection we Christians have nothing! One of my favorite verses (with my own paraphrase) from I Corinthians 15:17,19 is , “…if Jesus is not raised from the dead…, we are, of all people, the most to be pitied.” (See I Cor. 15:12-20.) But we do believe and it did happen!! Praise the Lord, this glorious Easter morning!!.

Blessings!

Luke 19:29-46

Dear RTB’ers,

It’s Holy Saturday. At St. Andrew’s we’re ending Holy Week, while in our readings we’re just beginning. Today, Palm Sunday, as recorded in Luke. We just celebrated Palm Sunday last Sunday, so the story is familiar to all of us. Anything new? To me, yeah: …He sent two of the disciples… (v. 29b). He sent two. Did it take two disciples to bring back a donkey? Recall that He sent 72 of His disciples into the Galilean villages two-by-two (Luke 10:1). Something special about working together…!

Two other incidents are reported in today’s reading – Jesus’ prophecy over Jerusalem’s destruction and His cleansing of the temple. Jesus will have more to say about the destruction of Jerusalem in chapter 21, so we’ll wait on that. As for His cleansing of the temple, this incident is recorded in Holy Week in all three Synoptic gospels, while John has it at the beginning of Jesus’ ministry (John 2:13-22). It’s interesting that the market was available in the temple for the benefit of travelers who had come from afar and did not bring sacrificial animals with them; thus with the market in place they could purchase them from traders in the temple. However, Jesus refers to this market as a “den of robbers” (v. 46b), so we’ll go with His take on this marketplace.

Have a blessed Holy Saturday!

Fred

Genesis 37-50

Dear RTB’ers,

It’s Good Friday, not a day where we put a “Happy” in front of that salutation, but rather a day for reflection. So it’s a good day for us to ponder Jesus and His sacrificial death on our behalf. I hope we’ll see one another at church this evening.

No new reading today. Instead the authors of Search the Scriptures ask us to consider Joseph’s life, from chapter 37 forward to the end of the book. I’m especially intrigued by their second question, essentially seeing Joseph as a “type” of Christ. So today, out of the ordinary, how about some posts from you? How many similarities can you find between Joseph and Jesus? I’ve found a few already (I even listed one a few days ago) and I’ll post my list sometime mid-afternoon. So, let us all hear from you!

Have a blessed Good Friday!

Genesis 50

Dear RTB’ers,

“…you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good…” (Gen. 50:19b). This verse stands out for me in all of Genesis, second only to Abraham’s offering of Isaac in Genesis 22. Things happen, good and bad, over which we have no control. Our response needs to be to trust in God for whatever outcome and move on. It’s Jesus’ Gethsemane prayer all over again (fittingly, on this Maundy Thursday remembrance day), “Not My will, but Your will be done.” And another variant on Jesus’ words that we need to embrace, “You are God, I am not.”

Have a blessed Holy Thursday!

Genesis 49

Dear RTB’ers,

Jacob’s blessings on his twelve sons. We see Jacob’s most abundant blessings falling on Judah and Joseph. Why not Reuben, his firstborn? While Israel lived in that land, Reuben went and lay with Bilhah his father’s concubine. And Israel heard of it. (Genesis 35:22) So Jacob bypassed Reuben. Why not Simeon and Levi? Go back to Genesis 34, where we read of the violence of their revenge on behalf of their sister, Dinah, and Jacob’s response to that episode: Then Jacob said to Simeon and Levi, “You have brought trouble on me by making me stink to the inhabitants of the land, the Canaanites and the Perizzites…” (Gen. 34:30). We will see Jacob’s “blessing” on Simeon and Levi fulfilled later in the division of the Promised Land among the twelve tribes, “…I will divide them in Jacob and scatter them in Israel.” (Gen. 49:7b) So, with these three set aside, Judah inherits the blessing of Jacob’s firstborn, the firstborn of Leah, and Joseph inherits the blessing of the firstborn of Rachel.

There’s so much more to be said about all this. Let’s discuss Judah and Joseph more at our next gathering on April 7.  

Blessings!

---

See also: January 16 (2023) / Genesis 47-50

Genesis 47:13-48:22

Dear RTB’ers,

Two major stories in today’s reading: Joseph/Pharaoh now owns everything in Egypt – the livestock, the land, and the people – and Jacob places Joseph’s younger, Ephraim, before the firstborn, Manasseh.

Joseph now owns the land and the people, so it is his decision to settle the people in the cities and remove them from their land (Gen. 47:21). I suspect that his major motivation in doing this had to do with the efficiency gained in food distribution during the continuing famine, but that final result – separating the people from their land – makes for a very harsh, emotional reaction from the people. I saw this policy in action on my first trip to Slovakia in 1996. [Recall that the Berlin Wall fell in 1989.] Slovakia (actually, Czechoslovakia) had come under the “Iron Curtain” domination of the USSR in 1948 and had effectively been governed from Moscow. I was in eastern Slovakia, teaching in their second-largest city, Kosice, when we were taken on a tour of a “collective farm”. This farm was a dairy farm; I recall a figure of 10,000 cows on this farm. [By contrast, in the United States, most cow-calf operations are relatively small and have fewer than 50 cows though a few very large operations (with more than 1,000 cows) can be found. (https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/charts/107126/cow-calf-farm-sizes_768px.png?v=8986)] The people on this collective farm lived in five or six villages spread out on the farmland property and worked the fields and the livestock and did the milking. The Soviets had taken the land and the peoples’ devastation from that separation had been severe – as Carol and I learned more personally in a later trip to Czechia in 2010. So this is what Joseph has done with the Egyptians; he has become a (hopefully, benevolent) dictator.

As for Jacob placing Ephraim before Manasseh (Gen. 48:14-20), recall that Jacob had, himself, taken Esau’s birthright and blessing. My Study Bible stated that Joseph now received the birthright of the firstborn: “…I give you one portion more than your brothers…” (Gen. 48:22a, NASB). Over time we will see the ascendancy of Ephraim over Manasseh and, in fact, over all of the twelve tribes except Judah (and possibly Benjamin).

Blessings!

Genesis 46:1-47:12

Dear RTB’ers,

Carol and I have our Maryland daughter, Nancy here with us this week, together with her two children, Matthew age 6 and Isabelle age 3, so I may have some difficulty getting these early-morning post out. But Holy Week might be a good time for me to fall short – and the rest of you pick it up a bit, commenting/posting on what you are reading.

On March 29 we do not have any new readings – the STS schedule simply has us reviewing Genesis 37-50, essentially Joseph’s life. The second question for that day asks us to draw parallels for Joseph as a “type” of Jesus. So I will jump in ahead a bit with what struck me today as I read about Joseph reuniting with his father Jacob. Jesus had come from His Father and upon his death, Resurrection and Ascension He returned to His Father. As I read about Jacob embracing his son, Joseph after those many years separated, I was thinking about what a happy homecoming that must have been for Jesus and His Father! Your thoughts?

Blessings!

Genesis 45

Dear RTB’ers,

Joseph and his brothers, again. A few days ago I spoke of confession: Then they said to one another, “Truly we are guilty concerning our brother, because we saw the distress of his soul when he pleaded with us, yet we would not listen; for that reason this distress has happened to us.” (Genesis 42:21) They had confessed their sin to one another. We are reminded of the power of corporate confession in James 5:16: Therefore, confess your sins to one another, and pray for one another so that you may be healed. The effective prayer of a righteous man can accomplish much.

So the brothers have gotten this far with their confession to one another. And in today’s reading they see their sin standing before them, exposed with Joseph’s full knowledge. Now, however, finally, somehow they must confess their sin to their father – or not. Scripture does not tell us of the brothers’ confessing to their father, Jacob, what they had done. Recall that they had slaughtered a goat and bloodied Joseph’s robe, with a suggestion to Jacob that a wild beast had apparently killed Joseph. (Genesis 37:31-33) In today’s passage the brothers return to their father, And they told him, saying, “Joseph is still alive, and indeed he is ruler over all the land of Egypt.” (v. 26a) No real confession in that statement. They could have kept their sin hidden: “I guess we were wrong about that wild beast killing him.” Possibly nothing was ever said about their selling Joseph to Midian traders. What really happened between the brothers and Jacob? We don’t know. Possibly this unconfessed sin festered in their lives?? All’s well that ends well?? Not according to the Psalmist: When I kept silent about my sin, my body wasted away through my groaning all day long. For day and night Your hand was heavy upon me; my vitality failed as with the dry heat of summer. [Then] I acknowledged my sin to You, and I did not hide my guilt; I said, “I will confess my wrongdoings to the LORD”; and You forgave the guilt of my sin. (Psalm 32:3-5) So, did the brothers (ever) confess? We’ll never know.

Blessings!

---

See also: January 15 / Genesis 43:16-46:34

Genesis 44

Dear RTB’ers,

Joseph and his brothers, again. The bulk of today’s reading (Genesis 44:16-34) is Judah speaking to Joseph, recounting Jacob’s relationship with Benjamin and offering himself up as Joseph’s servant in place of Benjamin. He had made this offer to his father in yesterday’s reading (Genesis 43:9) and now he is following through.

Let’s look further at Judah. First, he is making this offer in fulfillment of the promise he made to his father, but also he is doing it out of the love he has for his father: …when he sees that the boy is not with us, he will die. So your servants will bring the gray hair of your servant, our father, down to Sheol in sorrow. (v. 31) Second, Judah has twin boys back home (Genesis 38:18b, 27-30) and is willing to abandon them forever, again on behalf of his father. Finally, although Benjamin surely would be proclaiming his innocence, Judah does not know the truth – and even if Benjamin is lying, Judah is willing to proceed with his offer, again because of the depth of love that he has for his father.

Although we have only Judah offering himself up in place of Benjamin, there is an obvious connection here with Jesus’ death. First, Jesus has given up His life for ours in obedience to His Father, “Not My will, but Your will be done.” (Luke 22:42) Second, with His death, Jesus is willing to separate Himself from His Father’s love for that one and only moment in all of eternity, “My God, My God, why have You forsaken me?” (Matthew 27:46) Finally, Jesus knows that we are sinners, that we have been lying to Him and to ourselves all our lives, but again it is His hatred of sin and the depth of His love for us: “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.” (Luke 23:34) If Judah in his fallen humanity can offer up such sacrificial love on behalf of one man, how much more, how much deeper is Jesus’ eternal love for each and every one of us!

Blessings!