Acts 13:26-41

There’s a lot of information in these sixteen verses; I can’t touch on them all, but I’ll hit a few.

Here’s the one that hit me the most: …and for many days He appeared to those who had come up with Him from Galilee to Jerusalem… (v. 31). Paul is saying here that Jesus appeared alive after His resurrection ?only? to those who had come up with Him from Galilee to Jerusalem. That alone is strange, that Jesus would appear only to His disciples. But what is doubly strange is that Peter said the same thing a few chapters back: …but God raised Him on the third day and made Him to appear, not to all the people but to us who had been chosen by God as witnesses, who ate and drank with Him after He rose from the dead. (Acts 10:40-41). Peter even emphasizes, “…not to all the people…” (op. cit.) I posted earlier, wondering why Jesus did not appear to Pilate or the Jewish leaders. Again, I wonder – but I do not question!!!

Another item in that verse 31 quote above: …those who had come up with Him from Galilee to Jerusalem… All of Jesus’ disciples came with Him to Jerusalem from outside Jerusalem. All twelve, in fact, were Galileans except Judas who very possibly was from either the Transjordan or the south of Judea – but still, not from Jerusalem. I wonder if this item had any bearing on the Jewish leaders’ unwillingness to accept Jesus as the Messiah – not only did He not come from Jerusalem, but also His entire group of followers was from outside Jerusalem. Paul certainly contrasts Jesus’ disciples with …those who live in Jerusalem and their rulers… (v. 27). Interesting…

For those who live in Jerusalem and their rulers, because they did not recognize Him nor understand the utterances of the prophets, which are read every Sabbath, fulfilled them by condemning Him. (v. 27) Just a bit of clarity on this strange sentence construction: the “them” (five words from the end) refers to “…the utterances of the prophets…, earlier in mid-sentence. So leave out “which are read every Sabbath” and the sentence reads more clearly.

Finally, one last time Paul connects Jesus with His Old Testament forebears: what God promised to the fathers, this He has fulfilled to us their children by raising Jesus (vv. 32-33). Jesus IS the long-ago promise of the Father through the prophets!!

What a glorious passage!!!

Slava Bohu!

Acts 13:13-25

And John left them and returned to Jerusalem… (v. 13b) Some of you may not know it, but this is a key item in Acts. It will show up later when Paul and Barnabas are ready to go off on their second missionary journey (vv. 15:36, ff.). This “John” is John Mark, also known as Mark, the writer of the second Gospel.

Paul preaching: God gave them Saul the son of Kish, a man of the tribe of Benjamin… (v. 21). A small item here… Paul mentions Saul’s lineage here, from the tribe of Benjamin, the smallest of the twelve tribes of Israel, but he does not mention David’s tribe, Judah, from whom the Messiah would come. Why this disparity? Paul was himself also from the tribe of Benjamin. And the tribe of Benjamin has a storied history. Read the full story in Judges 19-20 of how Benjamin came to be the smallest tribe. So both (King) Saul and Paul came from Benjamin – worth noting that two huge Jewish leaders would come from this smallest tribe.

Beginning in verse 16 we have the first and longest of Paul’s sermons that are recorded in Acts (see https://www.leadershipresources.org/blog/list-of-sermons-in-acts/). Paul’s sermons often follow a pattern of history, Jesus, repentance, and salvation. Today we have only the first half of that sermon, with Paul tracing highlights of Jewish history before introducing Jesus and John the Baptist. The rest of the sermon, focusing on Jesus’ death, resurrection, and salvation through Him, will come tomorrow.

Slava Bohu!

Acts 13:4-12

You son of the devil, you enemy of all righteousness, full of all deceit and villainy… (v. 10) I chuckle every time I read Paul’s description of Elymas. I’m sure Paul was referring to his deeds, not his actual person, but he has harsh words, nonetheless! Recall that Peter had met up with a magician/sorcerer named Simon back in chapter 8 and Peter had properly chastised him – much less harshly than Paul’s words to Elymas. And with Simon we saw some hint of repentance; we don’t see any of that with Elymas. He is struck blind and that’s where the text leaves him, being led about by the hand. But Sergius Paulus, the proconsul believed, and Elymas was his friend; maybe Elymas also turned to faith. We can only hope!

But Saul, who was also called Paul… (v. 9) Here we have the first occurrence of Saul’s name being changed to Paul – and Paul never again being referred to as Saul. We also see a change from here on (except while in Jerusalem) of the listing of “Barnabas and Saul” changing to “Paul and Barnabas”. Paul, in fact, is the lead figure for the entire rest of the book of Acts. The proconsul may have been Paul’s first convert – and that conversion may have forever changed Paul. GLORY!

Slava Bohu!

Acts 13:1-3

That’s quite a diversity of prophets in Antioch – hailing from Cyprus, Crete, Tarsus, Lybia?, and Judea?!

We have not heard much about Saul since his visit to Jerusalem and his going back home to Tarsus (9:26-30). It’s now been about ten years since his conversion. We saw that Barnabas went to Tarsus to bring him back to Antioch (11:25-26) and that they have now been there for a year or so, including their trip to Jerusalem to bring famine relief to the disciples in Jerusalem (11:29, 12:25). Now, from this point forward most of the rest of this book will be devoted to Saul.

My Study Bible pointed out that this missionary trip to which the disciples were sending Barnabas and Saul was not the result of a planning meeting – not a “vision, goals, and objectives” retreat – but the Holy Spirit responding to their worshiping, praying, and fasting. A model for all of us, for all time, for all ways…!

Slava Bohu!

Acts 12:20-25

Luke is fond of his “summary verses” (v. 24 today). We’ve already seen them in Acts 2:43-47, 4:32-35, 5:42, and we’ll see more in Acts 16:5, 19:20, 28:31.

(From yesterday: “He’ll get his.”) Today, Herod got his! An awful, excruciatingly painful five days (Josephus), then death. I know that Jesus loved him to the end, but I wonder at Jesus’ meeting with him at Herod’s personal judgment day. How does Jesus show love when one of our number has chosen to reject Him? Again, sad…

Earlier in this chapter we saw the first occurrence of the young man named “John Mark”, when Peter went to his mother’s house upon his miraculous escape from prison. We see him again today in verse 25: And Barnabas and Saul returned from Jerusalem when they had completed their service, bringing with them John, whose other name was Mark. So here Mark begins his role as a traveling companion to Saul and his cousin, Barnabas. More on that in the next few days…

Slava Bohu!

Acts 12:11-19

…he <Peter> went to the house of Mary, the mother of John whose other name was Mark. (v. 12) A footnote in my Study Bible indicated that Mary was Barnabas’ aunt – with a reference to Colossians 4:10. Looking there I find Paul referring to Barnabas and Mark as cousins. That lends some understanding to Paul and Barnabas splitting in Acts 15:36-39 when Paul heads off on his second missionary journey. Barnabas wanted to take his cousin, Mark along, but Paul refused; he and Barnabas then went off in different directions. There is substantial evidence later in Paul’s letters that their split was not permanent, but healed over time.

At the beginning of this chapter, Herod (Agrippa) has James killed and Peter imprisoned. Now later in the chapter an angel rescues Peter and Herod has the prison guards killed because his soldiers could not find Peter in the prison. Seems excessively harsh to me, but that was the nature of the man. He’ll get his.

Slava Bohu!

Acts 12:5-10

I’m wondering this morning if a movie has ever been made of Peter’s life. Think about it – a successful, prosperous fisherman, possibly with a number of employees, has his own comfy house in a leading Galilean city. Gets called by and follows Jesus and is in His company for one to three years; becomes a part of Jesus’ closest three who are witnesses to the Transfiguration and other miracles. Witness to Lazarus being raised, Palm Sunday, the Last Supper, and Gethsemane. Denies Jesus three times – absolute low point…!! Then the Resurrection and a number of appearances, again with Peter at the center of the activity. After the Ascension, Jesus is now gone and the Acts story centers on Peter for most of the first twelve chapters. Pentecost; Peter and John and the lame beggar before the Council; Ananias and Sapphira; imprisonment and release; he and John to Samaria; he and James meeting Paul; raising Dorcas; Cornelius and visions and conversions and all that; now again prison and release. And a few more appearances in Acts before non-Biblical sources finish out his life. What a story!!

Slip on his sandals and walk in his shoes for a while. Better yet, slip on your own shoes and walk back your own life. Thank the Lord for where He has taken you and to where He has brought you. We each have his or her own “glory story”. Tell it!!

Slava Bohu!

Acts 12:1-4

Luke writes a lot in these four verses: James is killed; the Jews are happy; Peter is imprisoned; and the disciples are praying (oops, one verse too many!). Here we see an identification for one of the three “James” names – this one the brother of John and son of Zebedee. We had already seen in Paul’s conversion in chapter 9 another “James” name, when Paul visited Jerusalem and met with Peter and “James, the Lord’s brother” (Galatians 1:19). The third James is listed in the Gospels as “James, the son of Alphaeus” (Matthew 10:2, Mark 3:18, Luke 6:15). If you will, there is also possibly a fourth, “James, the Lesser”, mentioned in all three Synoptic Gospels in conjunction with his mother Mary at the cross and resurrection (i.e., “…Mary, the mother of James, the Lesser and Joses”; Mark 15:40). So Luke unravels this mystery a bit – but only a bit!

He killed James the brother of John with the sword, and when he saw that it pleased the Jews, he proceeded to arrest Peter also. (vv. 2-3) What bothers me here is “…he saw that it pleased the Jews…”. The Jewish leaders’ antagonism toward the Christians must have been very strong. Then later we have Herod …intending after the Passover to bring him out to the people. (v. 4b) Sounds like a replay of Pilate bringing Jesus out before the people – who then denounced Him. Sad.

Only four verses, but again a lot packed in there…

Slava Bohu!

Acts 11:19-30

(Barnabas) …he rejoiced and began to encourage them all with resolute heart to remain true to the Lord. (v. 23b) Here we see Barnabas again encouraging the believers as he did when he gave proceeds from the sale of land (4:36-37) and when he affirmed Paul to the Jerusalem church (9:27). One of my favorite Bible characters…!

Barnabas was sent to Antioch by the Jerusalem leaders. When he arrived and surveyed the situation he immediately determined that he should find Saul and bring him. This again reflects Barnabas’ confidence in Saul’s conversion and his knowledge of Paul’s gifts. Paul was entirely literate, probably conversant in Greek and Aramaic, and was raised in the Roman city of Tarsus (modern Turkey). So he would have been well qualified to meet with those Hellenistic Christians in Antioch – a cosmopolitan city, third only to Rome and Alexandria in the Roman Empire. It’s amazing how God puts the people he needs in the places where they are needed. So ask yourself about yourself…? Are you where you are needed?

Slava Bohu!

Acts 11:1-18

In today’s reading Luke retells the Cornelius incident from the previous chapter, this time from Peter’s perspective as he related the incident to the Jerusalem faithful. I have often found it strange that Luke repeated the incident in such detail, even word-for-word quotations in verses 7-9 and in verse 13. On considering that today, I thought further in the book of Acts how often Luke focuses on the apostles’ mission to the Gentiles. We saw Philip’s ministry in chapter 8, now Peter’s ministry in Acts 10-11, and Paul and his companions’ ministry in Acts 13, ff. It’s an important item for Luke, and I began to wonder at his origin, wondering if he had been a Gentile himself. The Encyclopedia Britannica confirmed the likelihood of that possibility (https://www.britannica.com/biography/Saint-Luke). That will be something to watch for as we move forward.

Another item that struck me today was the Jerusalem apostles’ ready acceptance of Peter’s story and God’s work among the Gentiles. They seem completely confident of Peter’s leadership and their trust in God working through him. Our spiritual leaders today also need that affirmation – the challenges they face from within and from without are substantial. They need our prayers and support!

Slava Bohu!