Date | Reading(s) | Verses |
01-Dec | Hebrews 10:11-18 | 8 |
02-Dec | Hebrews 10:19-25 | 7 |
03-Dec | Hebrews 10:26-31 | 6 |
04-Dec | Hebrews 10:32-39 | 8 |
05-Dec | Hebrews 11:1-12 | 12 |
06-Dec | Hebrews 11:13-22 | 10 |
07-Dec | Hebrews 11:23-29 | 7 |
08-Dec | Hebrews 11:30-40 | 11 |
09-Dec | Hebrews 12:1-11 | 11 |
10-Dec | Hebrews 12:12-17 | 6 |
11-Dec | Hebrews 12:18-24 | 7 |
12-Dec | Hebrews 12:25-29 | 5 |
13-Dec | Hebrews 13:1-8 | 8 |
14-Dec | Hebrews 13:9-17 | 9 |
15-Dec | Hebrews 13:18-25 | 8 |
16-Dec | I John 1:1-10 | 10 |
17-Dec | I John 2:1-11 | 11 |
18-Dec | I John 2:12-17 | 6 |
19-Dec | I John 2:18-29 | 12 |
20-Dec | I John 3:1-9 | 9 |
21-Dec | I John 3:10-15 | 6 |
22-Dec | I John 3:16-24 | 9 |
23-Dec | I John 4:1-11 | 11 |
24-Dec | I John 4:12-21 | 10 |
25-Dec | I John 5:1-5 | 5 |
26-Dec | I John 5:6-12 | 7 |
27-Dec | I John 5:13-21 | 9 |
28-Dec | II John 1:1-6 | 6 |
29-Dec | II John 1:7-13 | 7 |
30-Dec | III John 1:1-8 | 8 |
31-Dec | III John 1:9-14 | 6 |
November 30 / Hebrews 10:1-10
Hebrews 10:1-10
I’m going to re-write (with some edits) the first four verses, in 1-3-4-2 order: … the Law…, by the same sacrifices that are continually offered every year, can never make perfect those who draw near. But in these sacrifices there is a reminder of sins every year. For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins. Otherwise, would they not have ceased to be offered, since the worshipers, having once been cleansed, would no longer have any consciousness of sins? So as we look at the re-positioned second verse (bold above), this “no consciousness of sins” intrigues me. Yes, I understand that the blood of bulls and goat serves as a reminder of sin and does not remove “any consciousness of sins”, but does it follow that the blood of Jesus should remove from us “any consciousness of sins”? Unfortunately, I too often and too easily are reminded of my current and past sins. What does it take to have “any consciousness of sins” removed?
Slava Bohu!
November 29 / Hebrews 9:23-28
Hebrews 9:23-28
Another oft-quoted verse: And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment… (v. 28) The quote typically begins with “…it is…” or some variant thereto.
Thus it was necessary for the copies of the heavenly things to be purified with these rites, but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these. (v. 23) The verse that I have copied here is from the ESV translation. Two other translations that I read this morning (NASB, NKJV) are missing the word “rites”, having only the pronoun “these” twice in that verse. As I’ve said before, pronouns are often confusing for me – the “these” alone in other translations refers back to verse 22, the shedding and sprinkling of blood in the Jewish purification rites.
In that same verse, the “copies of the heavenly things” refers to the lampstand, the incense, the ark, etc. that were utensils associated with these Jewish purification rites (refer back to Heb 9:2,4 for a full listing of these items). The author makes a second reference to these items two verses later: …holy places made with hands, which are copies of the true things… (v. 24a) Since the author has referred to these items as copies of the heavenly things and copies of the true things it must mean that each of these items has a parallel in the heavens. It is left to our imagination what heaven must be like and how these earthly instruments have heavenly connections. It’s a nice thought to dream on.
Slava Bohu!
November 28 / Hebrews 9:15-22
Hebrews 9:15-22
A timeless, oft-quoted verse: …without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins. (v. 22b)
Something new hit me when I read this morning’s passage in my NASB translation: …a death has taken place for the redemption of the violations that were committed under the first covenant… (v. 15b) Jesus is the “death that has taken place”. In doing so, the verse says that He REDEEMED violations that occurred under the first covenant. Does that mean that under the old covenant, sins/violations were not redeemed, never fully forgiven, but only “covered”? Like our parents might have said when meting out justice, “It’s OK for now, I’ll deal with you later.” So those daily sacrifices only “covered” their sins? And even that once-a-year entry by the high priest into the Holy of Holies, the same…? A covering, but not full forgiveness? I commented a few days ago about the contrast between the death of an animal covering sins (animal for man) and Jesus’ death fully redeeming sins (man for man). Wondering…
For where there is a covenant, there must of necessity be the death of the one who made it. For a covenant is valid only when people are dead, for it is never in force while the one who made it lives. (vv. 16-17, NASB) The word “covenant” is translated “will” in the ESV and “testament” in the NKJV. Thinking of this “will” translation and applying it for today, basically beneficiaries have nothing under the will until the death of the one who made the will. And the same was true back then. Unless the father gave something during his lifetime (e.g., the parable of “The Prodigal Son”), the children did not inherit anything until the father died. Only with the death is the will in force. Verse 18 goes on to say, Therefore not even the first covenant was inaugurated without blood. In these three verses (16-18) the writer is drawing a parallel between our physical death and our spiritual death (sin). Only with Jesus’ death could we find full forgiveness of our sins.
Slava Bohu!
November 27 / Hebrews 9:11-14
Hebrews 9:11-14
It’s only a few verses today, but they’re powerful! The “not” words jumped off the page at me, all appearing in one sentence: [Christ] … entered through the greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made by hands, that is, not of this creation; and not through the blood of goats and calves… (vv. 11-12a, NASB) We think so much of who Jesus is and what He has done that it’s nice to consider who He is NOT and what He has NOT done. There’s not much more to say about that, just a small reflection.
In addition, today’s reading does not include a third “not”: Jesus entered that more perfect tabernacle not with daily sacrifices and not with an annual ritual, but ONCE, for all time, …an eternal redemption…!! (v. 12b) DONE!
Slava Bohu!
November 26 / Hebrews 9:1-10
Hebrews 9:1-10
Happy Thanksgiving, y’all!!
By this the Holy Spirit indicates that the way into the holy places is not yet opened as long as the first section is still standing, which is symbolic for the present age). According to this arrangement, gifts and sacrifices are offered that cannot perfect the conscience of the worshiper… (vv. 8-9) I have to keep reminding myself that the author is writing to Jews who are alive before the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in 70 A.D. With that in mind, the way that I read these two verses is that the phrase, as long as the first section is still standing could be referring to any individual who is still holding on to Jewish customs of the daily sacrifices being offered at the Temple. For those people, that “first section (of the Temple) is still standing” and they have not accepted Jesus as their Messiah. Those gifts and sacrifices being offered therein fall far short of that for which Jesus has sacrificed. It’s so easy to feel sorry for those very serious Jews today who continue to watch and wait for their Messiah. Will God honor their longing?? Sad…
Slava Bohu!
November 25 / Hebrews 8:7-13
Hebrews 8:7-13
Jeremiah’s prophecy (vv. 8-12) was made sometime around 600 BC. Now Jesus comes along some six centuries later, fulfilling a number of Old Testament messianic prophecies. Although Jeremiah’s prophecy was not fully messianic, it was probably something that Jewish leaders were following in conjunction with the coming of their Messiah. So with all the other confusions that Jesus brought to the Jewish leaders, they can now add this “new covenant” idea, wondering when and how that would occur. I feel sorry for them! With all that, the author of Hebrews clarifies it completely in today’s reading. The “old covenant” is discarded; the “new covenant” is here (v. 13)!!
I’ve always been confused by Jeremiah’s prophecy. I can understand verse 10b, I will put My laws into their minds, and write them on their hearts…, if I see these words as the work of the Holy Spirit in our lives. But verse 11 confuses me: And they shall not teach, each one his neighbor and each one his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they shall all know Me, from the least of them to the greatest. When will we all know Him? Now? End times? Confusing…
Slava Bohu!
November 24 / Hebrews 8:1-6
Hebrews 8:1-6
The second “priest” in the following verse is Jesus: For every high priest is appointed to offer gifts and sacrifices; thus it is necessary for this priest also to have something to offer. (v. 3) It struck me that the writer was distinguishing between gifts and sacrifices – clear distinctions exist in Leviticus. Jesus’ sacrifice (on the cross) was clear to me, so I was asking myself what might have been Jesus’ gift(s) to us. And after thinking about it, I would suggest that His very life on earth was His gift to us. His ministry, His teachings, His example… Through His life He has taught us everything we really need to know. That’s His gift!!
However, I also think the writer is making “gifts and sacrifices” a moot point, in that he goes on to say, But as it is, He has obtained a ministry that is as much more excellent than the old as the covenant He mediates is better, since it is enacted on better promises. (v. 6) Having accomplished “gifts and sacrifices”, Jesus’ has a new ministry – mediating a new covenant (tomorrow’s reading) – a major portion of which is interceding with the Father on our behalf. At least those are my thoughts.
Slava Bohu!
November 23 / Hebrews 7:23-28
Hebrews 7:23-38
He has no need, like those high priests, to offer sacrifices daily, first for His own sins and then for those of the people, since He did this once for all when He offered up Himself. (v. 27) Credit to my Study Bible for a really simple, totally obvious, but fully meaningful observation: The Jewish high priests offered up animals to cover sins – animal for man; Jesus offered up Himself for all our sins – man for man!! Once again we see how important was Jesus’ incarnation!
Slava Bohu!
November 22 / Hebrews 7:11-22
Hebrews 7:11-22
Early on in 2019 we read the following passage: Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them. (Matthew 5:17) In today’s reading a simple verse puts an exclamation mark on that statement. In the past I have often thought of Jesus’ fulfilling the Law in two activities. First, He was sinless so he fulfilled the requirements of the Law by following those laws. Second, His sacrificial death meant that animal sacrifices were no longer needed to cover our sins; He did it all on the cross.
So here’s today’s verse: For it is evident that our Lord was descended from Judah, and in connection with that tribe Moses said nothing about priests. (v. 14) Not only has Jesus fulfilled and “set aside” the Law, but in becoming our High Priest He has come out of the tribe of Judah – He has set aside the entire priesthood given to the Levites at Mt. Sinai! The High Priesthood has moved to an entirely different tribe! That is an exclamation mark on Jesus’ fulfilling the Law and the Prophets!
Slava Bohu!