Job 42
Then Job answered the LORD and said:
“I know that You can do all things,
and that no purpose of Yours can be thwarted.
‘Who is this that hides counsel without knowledge?’
Therefore I have uttered what I did not understand,
things too wonderful for me, which I did not know.
‘Hear, and I will speak;
I will question you, and you make it known to me.’
I had heard of You by the hearing of the ear,
but now my eye sees You;
therefore I despise myself,
and repent in dust and ashes.”
Job 42:1-6
Job (nearly) quotes what the LORD said in Job 38:2-3, now fully recognizing that he has been wrong. Previously, he had known about God; now he has encountered God and can begin to truly know God Himself. And with that Job finally relents — and repents.
Note that the LORD has not offered Job any kind of explanation for his plight. He has provided no answer to Job’s “Why?” That may leave us somewhat unsatisfied, but that is our own arrogance speaking. Job, on the other hand, repents. And that helps confirm the sincerity of Job’s repentance. That is, had God presented a “rational explanation” and justification for Job’s suffering, it would have been a concession to Job’s pride. Job then could have continued in that pride, saying, “See? I got God to explain himself.” And that would have left Job (and us) in a noxious state, entirely contrary to God’s loving purpose. So God gives no such explanation, allowing Job’s repentance — and redemption — to be complete.
The LORD then turns to Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar and says that His anger burns against them because they have not spoken of [Him] what is right, as [His] servant Job has. (Job 42:7-8) Earlier, when the friends were speaking, we referenced these verses to help us discern that what they said was off base. And now they get to see that for themselves. Nothing in the text says this, but I imagine that while God was speaking to Job, the friends were all nodding in smug agreement, gleeful that Job was getting his comeuppance — and now they are shocked to find out that they are the ones who have been wildly out of line, and that Job is the one that God says is to pray for them, and that his prayer will be accepted. Talk about a dressing-down!
Not only does God say that the friends had not spoken rightly, but He says that Job has spoken rightly. Yet Job was clearly in the wrong in accusing God of injustice. So what did Job say that was right? God does not spell that out, so we are left to ponder Job’s words in the light of the whole of Scripture, relying on the Holy Spirit to discern truth from error.
And finally we get to the fairytale ending, “And they all lived happily ever after.” (That’s my paraphrase of Job 42:10-17.) And that makes us feel all right about the whole thing. But what if this movie had an “alternative ending”? What if God decided to leave Job in his suffering? What if Job had no more children, and his siblings didn’t return but continued to reject him? What if Job died in his miserable condition and in poverty? Would that change anything for us? Would we come away with a different understanding of God? I’d like to suggest that if we need this “happy ending” to feel OK about God, then we probably need to read Job again…