II Samuel 22

Dear RTB’ers,

My Study Bible noted that this Psalm was probably written after David’s victories over Saul (and possibly other enemies), but before his sin with Bathsheba. Two sets of verses today confirm that likelihood. First, his victories, wherein he acknowledged the Lord’s hand in his deliverance: He rescued me from my strong enemy, from those who hated me, for they were too mighty for me … but the LORD was my support …He rescued me, because He delighted in me. (vv. 18-20) Then David speaks of his “righteousness” – his desire to serve the Lord and be right before Him: The LORD dealt with me according to my righteousness; according to the cleanness of my hands he rewarded me. For I have kept the ways of the LORD and have not wickedly departed from my God. … from His statutes I did not turn aside. I was blameless before Him and I kept myself from guilt. And the LORD has rewarded me according to my righteousness, according to my cleanness in His sight. (vv. 21-25) David sounds almost arrogant in these five verses. Maybe it’s his youth speaking out; as noted above, he has not yet met his Bathsheba difficulties.

The Psalm is included in the Psaltery as Psalm 18. We read that last year in mid-July (the 16^th and 17^th). Hopefully John can provide that link. Therein I explored today’s reading in greater detail.

For now, one other item struck me, a very small item: … people whom I had not known served me. (v. 44b) This is David in all his humility. He knows that he has been taken from his shepherding, chosen by the Lord as the youngest in his family, and even in his relative youth has attained to a level that he could not have imagined. People he had not known serve him. Amazing! To come from nowhere to be raised on high. I think of Harry Truman, of Bill Clinton, of Ronald Reagan and many others – all with common roots who rose to the highest position in our country. For this I will praise You, O LORD, among the nations and sing praises to Your name. (v. 50) A good closing.

Blessings!

---

See also:

• April 17 (2023) / II Samuel 22-23; I Chronicles 18:1-13
• July 16 (2024) / Psalm 18:1-30
• July 17 (2024) / Psalm 18:31-50

II Samuel 21

Dear RTB’ers,

Having read about Absalom’s desire for revenge – and David’s reaching out with compassion instead of revenge – today we see another act of revenge, the Gibeonites demanding seven deaths in place of Saul’s rampage against them. Isn’t it strange that dying in battle is so different from execution? Saul died in battle, albeit at his own hand (I Samuel 31:1-6), but now seven of his descendants are hung – with no guilt upon themselves, only a revenge motive by the Gibeonites. And mothers weep for their lost children, no matter how they die. (v. 10)

Presumably we go back in time with the second portion of today’s reading, to Philistines rising up against Israel, and we see victories by David’s men over Goliath’s relatives (actually, “descendants of the giants”, (II Samuel 21:16,18,20). You may be confused by the mention of “Goliath the Gittite” in verse 19. Didn’t David kill Goliath back in I Samuel 17? Thankfully, our companion STS book has a footnote directing us to I Chronicles 20:5, which clarifies that the text should read “the brother of Goliath the Gittite”.

Blessings!

---

See also: April 16 (2023) / II Samuel 21.

II Samuel 19:40-20:26

Dear RTB’ers,

More unrest and rebellion… Will it never end for David??!! Today’s reading begins with tribal infighting – the tribe of Judah (David’s home) against the ?ten? other tribes. Confusion here. There are twelve tribes (twelve sons of Jacob), counting Levi and Joseph (Ephraim and Manasseh as one tribe). Furthermore, if you set Levi aside and then count both Ephraim and Manasseh as tribes (see Genesis 48:5) you still have twelve tribes. So the “ten other tribes” (v. 19:43) presumably sets Levi aside and counts Joseph (Ephraim and Manasseh) as one tribe. Yes, a small matter, but confusing nonetheless.

Back to the infighting… Yesterday we saw that Judah was the first tribe to reinstall David as king (II Samuel 19:11-15), in that David was from the tribe of Judah. Now the other tribes are troubled with that, which leads to more open rebellion in the person of Sheba, a member of the tribe of Benjamin – Saul’s tribe. Not a whole lot to say about this rebellion – the main incident worth noting is Joab’s murder of Amasa, (II Samuel 20:9-10), an item that I referenced yesterday in David’s comment to Solomon. We continue to see that “other side of Joab” that I mentioned two days ago. It’s worth all of us reading John’s post from 2023 wherein he reflects on the person of Joab more fully.

Blessings!

II Samuel 19:9-39

Dear RTB’ers,

Although David had never actually stopped being king, much of Israel had chosen to follow Absalom. Now that Absalom is dead, his followers need to reverse their loyalties and bring David back to Jerusalem as the king over all the tribes of Israel. His coming back begins with his own tribe, Judah. Recall that Absalom had gone to Hebron, one of the leading cities of Judah to begin his rebellion. So David speaks to the elders of Judah, asking them to be the first to bring him back, since they were also the first to join Absalom’s rebellion.

Justice or mercy? David has decisions to make concerning those people who followed Absalom. First he names Absalom’s military commander, Amasa to be commander of his own army, thereby replacing Joab. Scripture does not tell us explicitly whether David knew that it was Joab who killed Absalom. However, his words to his son, Solomon in 1 Kings 2:5-6 suggest that he never knew that truth: Now you yourself also know what Joab the son of Zeruiah did to me, what he did to the two commanders of the armies of Israel, to Abner the son of Ner and to Amasa the son of Jether, whom he killed; … So act as your wisdom dictates, and do not let his gray hair go down to Sheol in peace. In that small speech David mentions both Abner and Amasa, but not Absalom, so maybe David never knew that truth?

David also has to deal with Shimei, who had cursed him as he was fleeing Jerusalem, and with Ziba, who misled him about his master, Mephibosheth. In both cases, mercy prevailed; David had seen enough of revenge and death. Mephibosheth’s words seem to echo David’s heart: Mephibosheth said to the king, “Oh, let him take it all, since my lord the king has come safely home.” (v. 39b) Peace. Mercy. Rest? Then there’s tomorrow…! There is no rest for David!

Blessings!

II Samuel 18:1-19:8

Dear RTB’ers,

Today we see the end of Absalom and his rebellion. Now King David has lost both his first- and second-born sons. And neither one was a credit to his lineage. Carol and I watched a movie last night where a father had lost one of his sons to cancer. Very moving, but sad… Parents should not out-live their children.

Joab is the lead character in today’s reading. When we last read about Joab (three days ago), I had said “Joab is looking good. (That won’t always be so…!)” Today we see the beginnings of that other side of Joab. He had clearly heard from the king that Absalom was to be spared. Yet he took it upon himself to kill Absalom, then allowed his men to further maim the body (II Samuel 18:15). I suspect that Joab is taking out his own revenge on Absalom because of how he had been treated – having to answer Absalom’s every call and then having his field burned by Absalom’s people. But we also see a good side of Joab again, in confronting David as to his mourning Absalom’s death. Joab is a strong personality, firm in his resolve; David will have to deal with that!

Today we see the rebellion squelched. Tomorrow we’ll see the kingdom renewed.

Blessings!

---

See also: April 15 (2023) / II Samuel 16:15-20:26.

II Samuel 16:15-17:29

Dear RTB’ers,

David’s flight from Absalom is different than when he was on the run from Saul. Earlier he was just a shepherd boy, now he is a king. Earlier he had only a small group with him (up to 600, I Samuel 27:2, 30:9), now he has the king’s entourage and probably thousands devoted to him. Earlier he and his men had to secure food and material wherever they could (recall the story of Abigail’s provision for him, I Samuel 25), but now he has wealthy benefactors bringing supplies from a number of sources. Still, my Study Bible suggests that Ahithopel’s advice was very good – that David and his company would have been wiped out in a weakened skirmish if Absalom had pursued right away. Thankfully, Hushai’s advice appealed to Absalom’s ego and the Lord was working for David: For the LORD had ordained to defeat the good counsel of Ahithophel, so that the LORD might bring harm upon Absalom. (v. 17:14b)

Absalom going in to his father’s concubines is (to me) his low point, even setting a tent on the roof … in the sight of all Israel. (v. 16:22) As Ahithopel suggested, Absalom would make himself “a stench” to his father. Herein Absalom satisfies both his revenge and his ego. Again, what a sad personality is Absalom. I wonder if anyone throughout later history ever named a child “Absalom”…

Blessings!

II Samuel 15:1-16:14

Dear RTB’ers,

I said yesterday that Absalom was not looking good. Today we see an even worse side of his behavior. And tomorrow we’ll see that there are no real limits to his bad behavior. Day by day for us, Absalom goes from bad to worse to worst. But I’m getting ahead…

Absalom asks leave of David to go to Hebron. You may recall that Hebron was where David first became king: David was thirty years old when he began to reign, and he reigned forty years. At Hebron he reigned over Judah seven years and six months, and at Jerusalem he reigned over all Israel and Judah thirty-three years. (II Samuel 5:4-5) So Absalom begins his rebellion in David’s homeland. Presumably he figures that if Hebron will follow him, then the rest of Judah will go along, then the remaining eleven tribes will also follow.

David is on the run – again! He has had relative peace these many years since Saul’s death, but now it’s Absalom pursuing him. It’s honorable of David to leave Jerusalem instead of making the capital city the site of the fiercest fighting. Plus, David is leaving it with the Lord: Then the king said to Zadok, “Carry the ark of God back into the city. If I find favor in the eyes of the LORD, He will bring me back and let me see both it and His dwelling place. But if He says, ‘I have no pleasure in you,’ behold, here I am, let Him do to me what seems good to Him.” (vv. 15:25-26)

In all this David is a good model for us to follow. He could have stayed in Jerusalem and fought and either won or lost. But rather than pursuing his own ends, He relies on the Lord to act. In the face of adversity I often find it hard to make a decision one way or the other. I reason things out the best I can and pray hard that God will guide me, “Not my will but Your will be done.” Rarely do I get a solid yes-or-no from the Lord, and in the end I must act. Somehow, in moving forward I get the sense that I am either on the correct path or that I have made a wrong decision. Either way, the Lord has been leading me instead of me charging forward on my own. David is a good model to follow.

Blessings!

---

See also: April 14 (2023) / II Samuel 15:1-16:14; Psalms 3, 7.

II Samuel 13:38-14:33

Dear RTB’ers,

Joab is looking good. (That won’t always be so…!) Yesterday we saw him bringing David to the fight against Rabbah so that David would get credit for the victory, not himself (II Samuel 12:26-28). And today Joab is all about reconciliation between David and Absalom, first enlisting the woman of Tekoa to fabricate a story, then getting David to bring Absalom to Jerusalem, and then finally urging David to meet with and forgive his son (after Absalom has burned his field!). Admittedly Joab is deceitful in bringing in the woman from Tekoa, but in so doing he is only following Nathan’s example of the two men and one small lamb. So yeah, Joab is looking good.

Not so with Absalom. He has murdered his half-brother, the crown prince Amnon, and escaped to his father-in-law’s house. David brings him to Jerusalem, but does not meet up with him – which angers Absalom enough to burn Joab’s field and demand an audience with his father, knowing full well that he will either receive forgiveness or a death sentence: Now therefore let me go into the presence of the king, and if there is guilt in me, let him put me to death. (v. 14:32b) Absalom sees his murder of Amnon as revenge, setting aside the Law’s mandate that revenge belongs to the Lord. (Deuteronomy 32:35, Psalm 94:1) So in the end we see reconciliation between father and son, but no mention of either repentance or forgiveness: So he came to the king and bowed himself on his face to the ground before the king, and the king kissed Absalom. (v. 14:33b) And they lived happily ever after…??

Blessings!

II Samuel 12:1-13:37

Dear RTB’ers,

I really liked Sean’s comment from yesterday, essentially “DON’T GO THERE!!” After that first wrong step, the next steps are even harder to avoid. Just skip that first step! Sounds easy, huh…??!!

What a sad couple of chapters! First, adultery and its aftermath, then rape and its consequences. As for the adultery, I would invite you to reread John’s post from July 30 on Psalm 51, then also where he refers to his earlier post from 2023. In our text today we read of David’s confession as just one line: David said to Nathan, “I have sinned against the LORD.” (v. 12:31a) But further reading of Psalm 51 reveals the depth of that confession. We simply cannot read chapter 12 without rereading Psalm 51. Go there. Reread Psalm 51.

As for the rape… Our heart goes out to Tamar. Her life has been ruined. The rapist, Amnon now hates her; her brother, Absalom silences her; and her father does nothing. No longer a virgin, she is left to a life of desolation and loneliness. And Tamar put ashes on her head and tore the long robe that she wore. And she laid her hand on her head and went away, crying aloud as she went. … So Tamar lived, a desolate woman, in her brother Absalom’s house. (vv. 13:19, 20b)

What a sad couple of chapters…

Blessings!

---

See also: April 13 (2023) / II Samuel 12:15b-14:33.

II Samuel 10-11

Dear RTB’ers,

Yesterday I noted that in II Samuel 8 we saw the height of David’s geographic power to the north as far as Damascus and to the east as far as the Euphrates River. Today’s battle does not dispute that statement. The Ammonites lived to the east of the Jordan River, along with the Moabites. Evidently David (Israel) had been at peace with the leaders of the Ammonites and David’s goodwill gesture (II Samuel 10:2) was rejected by Hanun, their new leader. Essentially Hanun’s aggression against David was a minor uprising with no change to David’s power – except that the Syrians (Arameans) no longer chose to fight against him! According to my Study Bible, “These events represent David’s last major campaign against combined foreign powers.”

David and Bathsheba, the well-known story of David’s adultery. My Study Bible, however, took it one step further, claiming the David had broken not only the seventh commandment (Exodus 20:14, adultery), but the sixth, ninth and tenth as well (Exodus 20:13, 16, 17 – murder, deception, and covetousness). Today’s closing verse says it all: But the thing that David had done displeased the LORD. (v. 11:27b)

Blessings!

---

See also: April 12 (2023) / I Chronicles 17; II Samuel 8-12:15a; Psalm 51.